Adrian Valadez v. State
This text of Adrian Valadez v. State (Adrian Valadez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-17-00161-CR
ADRIAN VALADEZ, Appellant v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
From the 19th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012-2160-C1
ORDER
A notice of appearance was filed in this appeal designating new lead counsel for
appellant. The designation complies with Rule 6.1(c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate
Procedure.
Accordingly, we enter the notice of appearance of counsel, Richard E. Wetzel, but
unless and until the Court receives an order that removes Jonathan Sibley as lead counsel
of record, Sibley remains lead counsel on appeal. Moreover, if Jessica Freud has
subsequently been appointed appellate counsel, only the trial court may relieve her of her duties to appellant. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 26.04(j)(2) (West 2009);
Enriquez v. State, 999 S.W.2d 906, 907 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, order).
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Order issued and filed June 7, 2017
Valadez v. State Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Adrian Valadez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adrian-valadez-v-state-texapp-2017.