Adrian Salmon v. M. Carillo Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General
222 F.3d 1046, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6433, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 8515, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18348, 2000 WL 1056057
Opinion
ORDER
The order filed June 28, 2000 is amended as follows: In light of the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470, 120 S.Ct. 1029, 145 L.Ed.2d 985 (2000), it is ORDERED that this case be remanded to the district court for an evidentiary hearing on Petitioner’s plea-related and appeal-related ineffectiveness of counsel claims. With this amendment, the petition for rehearing is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adrian Salmon v. M. Carillo Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, 222 F.3d 1046, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6433, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 8515, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 18348, 2000 WL 1056057 (9th Cir. 2000).
222 F.3d 1046 (Adrian Salmon v. M. Carillo Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Roe v. Flores-Ortega
528 U.S. 470 (Supreme Court, 2000)