Adrian Lamar Graham v. State of Florida

244 So. 3d 431
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 13, 2018
Docket17-0938
StatusPublished

This text of 244 So. 3d 431 (Adrian Lamar Graham v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adrian Lamar Graham v. State of Florida, 244 So. 3d 431 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D17-0938 _____________________________

ADRIAN LAMAR GRAHAM,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Jackson County. Shonna Young Gay, Judge.

June 13, 2018

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges his judgment and sentence, after jury trial, on one count of battery on a law enforcement officer. He asserts error in the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal, denial of a requested jury instruction, exclusion of a video from evidence, and denial of his motion for new trial. However, we do not reach these issues because Appellant also asserts and the State concedes error in the pretrial proceedings under rule 3.212, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, which requires reversal.

The record reflects that prior to trial Appellant was found incompetent to proceed to trial due to mental illness. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.212(c). A subsequent evaluation indicated the psychologist’s opinion that Appellant was competent to proceed. However, the record contains no transcript or other indication of an independent hearing or written order by the court finding that Appellant had been restored to competence prior to the trial.

Under these circumstances, proceeding to trial violated Appellant’s due process rights and reversal is required. Dougherty v. State, 149 So. 3d 672 (Fla. 2014). The case is remanded for further proceedings in light of Blaxton v. State, 188 So. 3d 48 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) and Belizaire v. State, 188 So. 3d 933 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and BILBREY and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bernard J. Dougherty v. State of Florida
149 So. 3d 672 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2014)
Otis Blaxton v. State of Florida
188 So. 3d 48 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Julian O. Belizaire v. State of Florida
188 So. 3d 933 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 So. 3d 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adrian-lamar-graham-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2018.