Adrian L. v. Abigail A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Adrian L. v. Abigail A.

219 A.D.2d 653, 631 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9292

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 18, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 219 A.D.2d 653 (Adrian L. v. Abigail A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adrian L. v. Abigail A., 219 A.D.2d 653, 631 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9292 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

In a paternity proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5, the petitioner appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, [654]*654Kings County (Pearce, J.), dated February 27, 1990, as dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court erred by denying the petitioner’s motion pursuant to Family Court Act § 532 for a blood-grouping test. However, applying the doctrine of equitable estoppel, we find that, under the circumstances of this case, the error does not require reversal (see, Matter of Leon L. v Carole H., 210 AD2d 484; Matter of Ettore I. v Angela D., 127 AD2d 6). O’Brien, J. P., Joy, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a paternity proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5, the petitioner appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, [654]*654Kings County (Pearce, J.), dated February 27, 1990, as dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court erred by denying the petitioner’s motion pursuant to Family Court Act § 532 for a blood-grouping test. However, applying the doctrine of equitable estoppel, we find that, under the circumstances of this case, the error does not require reversal (see, Matter of Leon L. v Carole H., 210 AD2d 484; Matter of Ettore I. v Angela D., 127 AD2d 6). O’Brien, J. P., Joy, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

219 A.D.2d 653, 631 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adrian-l-v-abigail-a-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack