Adrian Gomez v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Adrian Gomez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 7524
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 7, 2019·No. 01-18-00774-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION Cause number: 01-18-00774-CR Style: Adrian Gomez v. The State of Texas Date motion filed*: March 4, 2019 Type of motion: Third Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief Party filing motion: Appellant’s Counsel Kevin P. Keating Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief

Is appeal accelerated? No.

If motion to extend time: Original due date: December 6, 2018 Number of extensions granted: 2 Current Due Date: February 28, 2019 Date Requested: March 11, 2019

Ordered that motion is:  Granted If document is to be filed, document due: March 11, 2019.  No further extensions of time will be granted.  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ The Clerk of this court’s February 19, 2019 notice informed appellant that his second first extension was granted until February 28, 2019, but warned counsel that no further extensions would be granted. Because appellant’s counsel states that he needs another week to file his brief to research an issue of first impression, his third extension is granted, but counsel is warned that no further extensions will be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(1)(C). Accordingly, if appellant’s brief is not filed by March 11, 2019, this Court will abate this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2).

Judge’s signature: _/s/ Laura Carter Higley__________________________ ☒ Acting individually Acting for the Court Date: __March 7, 2019___

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adrian Gomez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Adrian Gomez v. State (Adrian Gomez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.