Adrian De Leon v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 4, 2009
Docket13-09-00606-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Adrian De Leon v. State (Adrian De Leon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adrian De Leon v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-09-00583-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY

On Relator’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Request for Emergency Relief.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Relator, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, has filed a petition for

writ of mandamus with this Court alleging that respondent, the Honorable Leonel Alejandro, presiding judge of the 357th Judicial District Court of Cameron County, Texas, abused his

discretion by issuing an order on October 2, 2009 denying relator’s “Motion to Quash and

for Protection” in trial court cause number 2008-08-4732-E, styled Rudy Saldana v. Aron

Asok Polakulathasokan, et al. The trial court’s order denied relator’s request to quash a

“Notice of Oral and Videotaped Deposition With Subpoena Duces Tecum” served by the

real party in interest, Rudy Saldana, on August 31, 2009. Relator also filed a request for emergency relief. On October 23, 2009, we granted

relator’s request for emergency relief, imposed an emergency stay of the trial court’s

August 31, 2009 order, and requested that the real party in interest respond to relator’s

petition. The real party in interest filed such a response on November 2, 2009.

This Court, having reviewed and fully considered relator’s petition and the response

thereto filed by the real party in interest, is of the opinion that the relator has not shown

itself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is

DENIED. Further, we hereby VACATE the emergency stay previously imposed by this

Court on October 23, 2009 in trial court cause number 2008-08-4732-E.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 4th day of November, 2009.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Adrian De Leon v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adrian-de-leon-v-state-texapp-2009.