Adrian Cortez and Melinda Cortez v. Martha Reyna Perez
This text of Adrian Cortez and Melinda Cortez v. Martha Reyna Perez (Adrian Cortez and Melinda Cortez v. Martha Reyna Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-24-00349-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
ADRIAN CORTEZ AND MELINDA CORTEZ, Appellants,
v.
MARTHA REYNA PEREZ, Appellee.
ON APPEAL FROM THE 92ND DISTRICT COURT OF HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Tijerina and Peña Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras
This matter is before the Court on appellants’ motion to dismiss. Appellants wish
to withdraw or dismiss their appeal.
Having considered appellants’ motion, we are of the opinion that the motion should
be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, appellants’ motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed. Costs will be taxed against the appellants.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs
against the appellant.”). Because the appeal is dismissed at the appellants’ request, no
motion for rehearing will be entertained.
DORI CONTRERAS Chief Justice
Delivered and filed on the 18th day of July, 2024.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Adrian Cortez and Melinda Cortez v. Martha Reyna Perez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adrian-cortez-and-melinda-cortez-v-martha-reyna-perez-texapp-2024.