Adorence Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Adorence Co. v. United States

50 Cust. Ct. 237, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 4007

United States Customs Court·Decided March 11, 1963·No. No. 67504; protests 59/28226, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon gloves and mittens similar in use to cotton gloves and mittens and that the issues are the same in all material respects as those in United States v. Steinberg Bros. (47 CCPA 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained, with the exception of the items of merchandise in protest 60/218 contained in cases 31, 47, and 48, which were withdrawn from warehouse subsequent to the enactment of Public Law 85-645 (T.D. 54676), effective September 13, 1958.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon gloves and mittens similar in use to cotton gloves and mittens and that the issues are the same in all material respects as those in United States v. Steinberg Bros. (47 CCPA 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained, with the exception of the items of merchandise in protest 60/218 contained in cases 31, 47, and 48, which were withdrawn from warehouse subsequent to the enactment of Public Law 85-645 (T.D. 54676), effective September 13, 1958.

Adorence Co. v. United States, 50 Cust. Ct. 237, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 4007 (cusc 1963).

Pincite

50 Cust. Ct. 237 (Adorence Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.