Adoption of a Minor

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Adoption of a Minor

327 N.E.2d 735, 367 Mass. 907, 1975 Mass. LEXIS 1082

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedMay 5, 1975

DocketNo. 1

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 327 N.E.2d 735 (Adoption of a Minor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adoption of a Minor, 327 N.E.2d 735, 367 Mass. 907, 1975 Mass. LEXIS 1082 (Mass. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

We affirm decrees of adoption and change of name of two minor children entered by the Probate Court, Barnstable County, over the objection of the respondent father (appellant here). The mother and father were divorced in 1965; custody of these boys, then aged four and five, was awarded to the mother, but no provision was made for support. The mother remarried in 1966, and there are two children of that marriage. No support was forthcoming from the father until the summer of 1972 when, having evidently heard that the mother and her present husband were about to file the petitions for adoption, he started to make trifling contributions; nor has the father shown much interest in visiting the boys since the divorce, although his record in this regard seems to have improved somewhat after his own remarriage a few years ago. On the other hand, the petitioners (appellees here) have long cared for and supported the boys, and all four children appear to be welded with the petitioners into a harmonious and successful family unit. The boys regard their stepfather as their real father; and their original surname, differing from that of the rest of the family, has been an embarrassment to them presenting an emotional problem. Under G. L. c. 210, § 3 (a) and (c), as appearing in St. 1972, c. 800, § 2, the natural father’s consent may be dispensed with in the present situation (other conditions precedent being satisfied) upon a finding that adoption is in “the best interests of the child”; in making that determination the court is to consider the “ ability, capacity, fitness and readiness” of the natural father to “ assume parental responsibility” and is also to consider the “ability,” and so forth, of the petitioners. See, for discussion of the standard, Petition of the New England Home for Little Wanderers to Dispense with Consent to Adoption, ante, 631 (1975). The judge’s report of material facts (evidence is not reported) appraising the facts convincingly supports his finding that adoption, [908]*908with accompanying change of name, will serve the boys’ “best interests.”

Stephen R. Wainwright (William M. Wainwright with him) for the respondent. S. David Goldberg for the petitioners.

Decrees affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

We affirm decrees of adoption and change of name of two minor children entered by the Probate Court, Barnstable County, over the objection of the respondent father (appellant here). The mother and father were divorced in 1965; custody of these boys, then aged four and five, was awarded to the mother, but no provision was made for support. The mother remarried in 1966, and there are two children of that marriage. No support was forthcoming from the father until the summer of 1972 when, having evidently heard that the mother and her present husband were about to file the petitions for adoption, he started to make trifling contributions; nor has the father shown much interest in visiting the boys since the divorce, although his record in this regard seems to have improved somewhat after his own remarriage a few years ago. On the other hand, the petitioners (appellees here) have long cared for and supported the boys, and all four children appear to be welded with the petitioners into a harmonious and successful family unit. The boys regard their stepfather as their real father; and their original surname, differing from that of the rest of the family, has been an embarrassment to them presenting an emotional problem. Under G. L. c. 210, § 3 (a) and (c), as appearing in St. 1972, c. 800, § 2, the natural father’s consent may be dispensed with in the present situation (other conditions precedent being satisfied) upon a finding that adoption is in “the best interests of the child”; in making that determination the court is to consider the “ ability, capacity, fitness and readiness” of the natural father to “ assume parental responsibility” and is also to consider the “ability,” and so forth, of the petitioners. See, for discussion of the standard, Petition of the New England Home for Little Wanderers to Dispense with Consent to Adoption, ante, 631 (1975). The judge’s report of material facts (evidence is not reported) appraising the facts convincingly supports his finding that adoption, [908]*908with accompanying change of name, will serve the boys’ “best interests.”

Stephen R. Wainwright (William M. Wainwright with him) for the respondent. S. David Goldberg for the petitioners.

Decrees affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

327 N.E.2d 735, 367 Mass. 907, 1975 Mass. LEXIS 1082, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adoption-of-a-minor-mass-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack