Adolphe Hurst & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Adolphe Hurst & Co. v. United States

22 Cust. Ct. 289, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1516

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 21, 1949

DocketNo. 53054; protest 60058-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 22 Cust. Ct. 289 (Adolphe Hurst & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adolphe Hurst & Co. v. United States, 22 Cust. Ct. 289, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1516 (cusc 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in Mamary Bros., Inc. v. United States (21 Cust. Ct. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoice should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on the entry involved. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in Mamary Bros., Inc. v. United States (21 Cust. Ct. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoice should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on the entry involved. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 Cust. Ct. 289, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adolphe-hurst-co-v-united-states-cusc-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack