Home/Third Circuit/Adolph Hohensee v. J. Julius Levy

Adolph Hohensee v. J. Julius Levy

282 F.2d 564, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 3699
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedSeptember 22, 1960
Docket13114_1
StatusPublished

This text of 282 F.2d 564 (Adolph Hohensee v. J. Julius Levy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adolph Hohensee v. J. Julius Levy, 282 F.2d 564, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 3699 (3d Cir. 1960).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is no jurisdiction for a federal court in this case. The complaint shows that both plaintiff and defendant are residents of Pennsylvania. The subject matter is a claimed tort which is alleged to have taken place in Pennsylvania. Since, under the statutes, there is no jurisdiction for a federal court to act, the appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
282 F.2d 564, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 3699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adolph-hohensee-v-j-julius-levy-ca3-1960.