Adolph Goldmark & Sons Corp. v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 623
United States Customs Court·Decided August 15, 1957·No. Reap. Dec. 8964; Entry Nos. 8069; 9959; 11084·Published

Opinion

Richardson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision on the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel that the merchandise covered by the instant appeal for reappraisement consists of licorice tid bits exported from England.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that on or about the date of exportation there was no foreign, export or United States value, as those terms are defined in Section 402 (c) (d) or (e) respectively of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, for such or similar merchandise and that the cost of production as defined in subdivision (f) of said Section 402 was 102 shillings 6 pence.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that these appeals for reappraisement be submitted on this stipulation.

[624]*624On the agreed facts, I find the cost of production as defined in 19 U. S. C. section 1402 (f), (section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930), to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved herein, and that such value was 102 shillings, 6 pence.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adolph Goldmark & Sons Corp. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 623 (cusc 1957).

39 Cust. Ct. 623 (Adolph Goldmark & Sons Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.