Adolph Goldmark & Son Corp. v. United States
39 Cust. Ct. 488
United States Customs Court·Decided November 13, 1957·No. No. 61334; protests 278635-K, etc. (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sprats in oil similar in all material respects to those the subject of Arnold Sorensin Co., Inc., et al. v. United States (38 Cust. Ct. 199, C. D. 1862), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adolph Goldmark & Son Corp. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 488 (cusc 1957).
39 Cust. Ct. 488 (Adolph Goldmark & Son Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Arnold Sorensin Co. v. United States
38 Cust. Ct. 199 (U.S. Customs Court, 1957)