Adolph Goldmark & Son Corp. v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 488
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedNovember 13, 1957
DocketNo. 61334; protests 278635-K, etc. (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 39 Cust. Ct. 488 (Adolph Goldmark & Son Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adolph Goldmark & Son Corp. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 488 (cusc 1957).

Opinion

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sprats in oil similar in all material respects to those the subject of Arnold Sorensin Co., Inc., et al. v. United States (38 Cust. Ct. 199, C. D. 1862), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arnold Sorensin Co. v. United States
38 Cust. Ct. 199 (U.S. Customs Court, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 Cust. Ct. 488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adolph-goldmark-son-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1957.