Adolph Coors Co. v. Pursel

26 N.W.2d 550, 250 Wis. 174
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 25, 1947
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 26 N.W.2d 550 (Adolph Coors Co. v. Pursel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adolph Coors Co. v. Pursel, 26 N.W.2d 550, 250 Wis. 174 (Wis. 1947).

Opinion

Rosenbekry, C. J.

The determination of the issues in these actions depends almost entirely upon the credibility of the witnesses for the respective parties. Such documentary evidence as was offered and received tends to support the plaintiff’s contentions. The trial court gave the matter careful consideration. He saw and heard the witnesses. We have carefully reviewed the evidence offered upon the trial and find that the trial court reached the right determination. Certainly his conclusions upon the evidence are not against the *176 clear preponderance and great weight of the evidence, and for that reason the court’s findings cannot be disturbed.

Inasmuch as the controversy deals almost entirely with questions of fact no useful purpose would be served by setting-out the evidence in detail. The claim of the defendant, Harry Pursel, that the plaintiff was indebted to him in the sum of $38,996.15, in view of the evidence offered by him upon the trial to sustain it, is sufficient of itself to cast doubt upon the probity and good faith of the defendant, Harry Pursel.

By the Court. — Judgment in each case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clarke Floor MacHine Co. v. De Vere Chemical Co.
101 N.W.2d 655 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 N.W.2d 550, 250 Wis. 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adolph-coors-co-v-pursel-wis-1947.