ADOLFO PEREZ SR. v. ADOLFO PEREZ JR.

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 3, 2021·No. 20-1352·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed March 3, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________

No. 3D20-1352 Lower Tribunal No. 19-9346 ________________

Adolfo Perez Sr., et al., Appellants,

vs.

Adolfo Perez Jr., et al., Appellees.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Martin Zilber, Judge.

Weissman & Dervishi, P.A., and Peter A. Tappert, for appellants.

Choi & Menezes, LLP, and IL Young Choi, for appellees.

Before EMAS, C.J., and SCALES and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Abramson v. Brant, 141 So. 2d 777, 778 (Fla. 3d DCA

1962) (“[T]he court making the appointment [of a receiver] may, at its discretion, during the pendency of the action make such further orders as

are necessary and proper for the protection of the property and interests

concerned.”); Puma Enters. Corp. v. Vitale, 566 So. 2d 1343, 1345 (Fla. 3d

DCA 1990) (affirming, under an abuse of discretion standard, the trial court’s

ex parte order expanding the scope of an existing receivership to include an

assignee of assets subject to the initial receivership).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ADOLFO PEREZ SR. v. ADOLFO PEREZ JR., (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

ADOLFO PEREZ SR. v. ADOLFO PEREZ JR. (ADOLFO PEREZ SR. v. ADOLFO PEREZ JR.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Puma Enterprises Corp. v. Vitale
566 So. 2d 1343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Abramson v. Brant
141 So. 2d 777 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)