Adolfo Garcia Ybarra Jr. v. Warden Strong

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 17, 2020
Docket13-20-00030-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Adolfo Garcia Ybarra Jr. v. Warden Strong (Adolfo Garcia Ybarra Jr. v. Warden Strong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adolfo Garcia Ybarra Jr. v. Warden Strong, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-20-00030-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

ADOLFO GARCIA YBARRA JR., Appellant,

v.

WARDEN STRONG, ET AL., Appellees.

On appeal from the 278th District Court of Walker County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Hinojosa Order Per Curiam

Appellant, Adlolfo Garcia Ybarra Jr., appeals from a final judgment made in cause

number 1828995 entered by the 278th District Court in Walker County, Texas. He

proceeds pro se and is incarcerated. Appellant filed several letter motions indicating he

has been previously found indigent and may proceed in forma pauperis. The Texas Legislature provides for the possibility of appointed counsel in civil

matters by conferring upon a district court judge the discretion to “appoint counsel to

attend to the cause of a party who makes an affidavit that he is too poor to employ counsel

to attend to the cause.” TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §24.016 (West, Westlaw through 2013

C.S.); see Gibson, 102 S.W.3d at 712. Under exceptional circumstances, “the public and

private interests at stake [may be] such that the administration of justice may best be

served by appointing a lawyer to represent an indigent civil litigant.” Travelers Indem. Co.

v. Mayfield, 923 S.W.2d 590, 594 (Tex. 1996).

This sequence of events requires us to effectuate our responsibility to avoid further

delay and to preserve the parties' rights. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a)(2). Accordingly,

this appeal is ABATED and the cause REMANDED to the trial court.

Upon remand, the judge of the trial court shall immediately cause notice to be given

and conduct a hearing to determine the following: 1) whether appellant is indigent; 2) if

appellant is indigent, whether counsel should be appointed to represent appellant on

appeal; 3) whether appellant is entitled to have the clerk’s and/or reporter’s record

furnished without charge; 4) if appellant is not entitled to have the clerk’s and/or reporter’s

record furnished at no charge, the date appellant will request preparation and make

acceptable payment arrangements for the reporter’s record; and 5) what orders, if any,

should be entered to assure the filing of appropriate notices and documentation to dismiss

appellant’s appeal if appellant does not desire to prosecute this appeal, or if appellant

desires to prosecute the appeal, to assure that the clerk’s and reporter’s record will be

filed promptly and that the appeal will be diligently pursued.

2 The trial court shall prepare and file its findings and orders and cause them to be

included in a supplemental clerk's record which should be submitted to the Clerk of this

Court within sixty days from the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 17th day of April, 2020.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Travelers Indemnity Co. of Connecticut v. Mayfield
923 S.W.2d 590 (Texas Supreme Court, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Adolfo Garcia Ybarra Jr. v. Warden Strong, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adolfo-garcia-ybarra-jr-v-warden-strong-texapp-2020.