Adolfo Avila, Jr. v. Paul Schnell

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 31, 2025
Docket24-2261
StatusUnpublished

This text of Adolfo Avila, Jr. v. Paul Schnell (Adolfo Avila, Jr. v. Paul Schnell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adolfo Avila, Jr. v. Paul Schnell, (8th Cir. 2025).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 24-2261 ___________________________

Adolfo Gutierrez Avila, Jr., on behalf of 44 listed members (similarly situated)

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Paul Schnell, Being sued in his/her individual capacity; Being sued jointly and severally liable; Vicki Janssen, Being sued in his/her individual capacity; Being sued jointly and severally liable; Jeanette Wilson, Being sued in his/her individual capacity; Being sued jointly and severally liable; Jessica Olson, Being sued in his/her individual capacity; Being sued jointly and severally liable; Tina Sneen, Being sued in his/her individual capacity; Being sued jointly and severally liable

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________

Submitted: January 21, 2025 Filed: January 31, 2025 [Unpublished] ____________

Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM. Adolfo Avila, Jr., appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action and the denial of his motion to amend the operative complaint. After careful de novo review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See East v. Minnehaha Cnty., 986 F.3d 816, 820 (8th Cir. 2021) (de novo review of dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. The motions to supplement the record and to file a supplemental brief are denied as moot. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Nancy E. Brasel, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Douglas L. Micko, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Donald East v. Minnehaha County
986 F.3d 816 (Eighth Circuit, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Adolfo Avila, Jr. v. Paul Schnell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adolfo-avila-jr-v-paul-schnell-ca8-2025.