Adolfo A. Corripio v. Commodore Plaza Condominium Association, Inc., Etc.

• Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
• Decided: July 16, 2025
• Docket: 3D2024-1732
• Status: Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed July 16, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D24-1732 Lower Tribunal No. 22-22499-CA-01 ________________

Adolfo A. Corripio, Appellant,

vs.

Commodore Plaza Condominium Association, Inc., etc., Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Antonio Arzola, Judge.

Sheldon R. Rosenthal, for appellant.

Poliakoff Backer, LLP, and Kenneth E. Zeilberger (Boca Raton), for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Appellant Adolfo A. Corripio (Defendant below) appeals from an order

entering summary judgment in favor of Appellee Commodore Plaza

Condominium Association (Plaintiff below). Though the order is titled

“Summary Final Judgment for Plaintiff[,]” it does not fully adjudicate Counts

II, III, and V of Commodore’s Complaint. See Salgado v. Suyapa-Jimenez,

254 So. 3d 1053, 1055 n.4 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“Generally, the test

employed by the appellate court to determine finality of an order, judgment

or decree is whether the order in question constitutes an end to the judicial

labor in the cause, and nothing further remains to be done by the court to

effectuate a termination of the cause as between the parties directly affected.

The title of the order, judgment or decree is not controlling.” (citations and

internal quotations marks omitted)).

We therefore dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Camargo

v. Prime W., Inc., 225 So. 3d 912, 913 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (“We dismiss the

Camargos’ appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the partial summary

judgment granted in favor of Prime West is a nonfinal, nonappealable

order.”).

Dismissed.