Adolff v. Molia

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Adolff v. Molia

86 N.Y.S. 1128

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJanuary 25, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 86 N.Y.S. 1128 (Adolff v. Molia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adolff v. Molia, 86 N.Y.S. 1128 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVIS, J.

The action is brought to recover a balance of $124.09 claimed to be due for work, labor, and services, and materials furnished. The answer was in effect a general denial, and contained a counterclaim for $225 for breach of contract and improper performance of the work. The questions litigated were questions purely of fact, as to which there was conflicting evidence. There was sufficient evidence to sustain the decision of the Justice presiding at the trial below, and I see no reason why the judgment should be interfered with. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIS, J.

The action is brought to recover a balance of $124.09 claimed to be due for work, labor, and services, and materials furnished. The answer was in effect a general denial, and contained a counterclaim for $225 for breach of contract and improper performance of the work. The questions litigated were questions purely of fact, as to which there was conflicting evidence. There was sufficient evidence to sustain the decision of the Justice presiding at the trial below, and I see no reason why the judgment should be interfered with. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

86 N.Y.S. 1128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adolff-v-molia-nyappterm-1904.