Adolf v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Adolf v. Board of Education

144 A.D.2d 554, 535 N.Y.S.2d 960, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11921

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 21, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 144 A.D.2d 554 (Adolf v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adolf v. Board of Education, 144 A.D.2d 554, 535 N.Y.S.2d 960, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11921 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the appellants to grant the respondent retroactive reinstatement to his teaching position, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.), dated March 17, 1987, which granted the petitioner retroactive reinstatement to his teaching position together with retroactive seniority credit and back pay for the period from September 4, 1984 to March 15, 1985.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits (see, Matter of Frasier v Board of Educ., 71 NY2d 763). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Eiber, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the appellants to grant the respondent retroactive reinstatement to his teaching position, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.), dated March 17, 1987, which granted the petitioner retroactive reinstatement to his teaching position together with retroactive seniority credit and back pay for the period from September 4, 1984 to March 15, 1985.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits (see, Matter of Frasier v Board of Educ., 71 NY2d 763). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Eiber, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 A.D.2d 554, 535 N.Y.S.2d 960, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adolf-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack