Admr's of Herlock v. Riser

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Admr's of Herlock v. Riser

12 S.C.L. 481

DecidedNovember 15, 1821

StatusPublished

This text of 12 S.C.L. 481 (Admr's of Herlock v. Riser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Admr's of Herlock v. Riser, 12 S.C.L. 481 (S.C. 1821).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Gantt

delivered the opinion of the court,

The court have viewed in the same light as the judge below, the consequences flowing.from shops established for the sole purpose of vending whiskey and other ardent spirits ; but under existing circumstances, as these accounts appear to have been legally proved, they, think the nonsuits were improperly ordered.

Nott £5? McCord, (for Footman,) for the motion. Glover, contra.

The cases are therefore to be reinstated on the docket for trial at the next court.

Justices1 Johnson, Huger, Nott and Colcock, concurred,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Gantt

delivered the opinion of the court,

The court have viewed in the same light as the judge below, the consequences flowing.from shops established for the sole purpose of vending whiskey and other ardent spirits ; but under existing circumstances, as these accounts appear to have been legally proved, they, think the nonsuits were improperly ordered.

Nott £5? McCord, (for Footman,) for the motion. Glover, contra.

The cases are therefore to be reinstated on the docket for trial at the next court.

Justices1 Johnson, Huger, Nott and Colcock, concurred,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 S.C.L. 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/admrs-of-herlock-v-riser-sc-1821.