Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund v. Ortego

475 So. 2d 764, 27 Educ. L. Rep. 1021, 1985 La. LEXIS 9336
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 20, 1985·No. No. 85-C-1155·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Service of process was not valid under the Long Arm Statute. LSA-R.S. 13:3204 provides that a certified copy of the citation and the petition shall be sent to the defendant by registered or certified mail or actually delivered to the defendant. If mailed, the notice must be received by defendant or by a person authorized to receive mail on his behalf.

The librarian here had not been designated to receive mail for the defendant but merely sorted it for the school. Defendant, as far as the record reflects, did not receive the letter and was in fact not even in California when the mailing was received at the school. Compare Howard Avenue Realty Corporation v. McIntosh, 352 So.2d 348 (La.App. 4 Cir.1978); Thomas Organ Company v. Universal Music Company, 261 So.2d 323 (La.App. 1 Cir.1972).

The judgment of the court of appeal, 469 So.2d 1120, is reversed.

LEMMON, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund v. Ortego, 475 So. 2d 764, 27 Educ. L. Rep. 1021, 1985 La. LEXIS 9336 (La. 1985).

475 So. 2d 764 (Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund v. Ortego) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Booker v. Reyes
M.D. Louisiana, 2021
Lanier v. McMath Construction, Inc.
141 So. 3d 974 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2013)
Dukov v. 701 Corp.
668 So. 2d 379 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)