Administrators of Porter v. Kenny
This text of 12 S.C.L. 205 (Administrators of Porter v. Kenny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
If the judge who presided in this case had known the state of the pleadings, the probability is that he would not have suffered the parties to have gone to trial. But after verdict, we must take the case as we find it, and determine it according to the statement of facts which it presents. — • As the defendant has not denied the plaintiff’s replication, it must be taken as true. We must presume every thing against the party who refuses or neglects to put in his plea, otherwise he would derive an advantage from his own wrong, which is not to be; allowed.
A new trial must he granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 S.C.L. 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/administrators-of-porter-v-kenny-sc-1821.