Administrator of Bell v. Administrators of Huggins

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Administrator of Bell v. Administrators of Huggins

1 S.C.L. 326

DecidedJuly 1, 1793

StatusPublished

This text of 1 S.C.L. 326 (Administrator of Bell v. Administrators of Huggins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Administrator of Bell v. Administrators of Huggins, 1 S.C.L. 326 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1793).

Pincite

Opinion

A surveyor was then called, who proved the lines, and that part of the land was taken away by Daniel*3 elder grant, but that the injury would not be so great as to defeat the main object the purchaser had in view, when he purchased. Whereupon the jury, by direction of the court, deducted the value of the land so taken away by the elder grant, from the amount of the bond, and gave in favour of the nlaintiff, a verdict for the balance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A surveyor was then called, who proved the lines, and that part of the land was taken away by Daniel*3 elder grant, but that the injury would not be so great as to defeat the main object the purchaser had in view, when he purchased. Whereupon the jury, by direction of the court, deducted the value of the land so taken away by the elder grant, from the amount of the bond, and gave in favour of the nlaintiff, a verdict for the balance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 S.C.L. 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/administrator-of-bell-v-administrators-of-huggins-pactcompl-1793.