ADMERSON CLEBER-EUGENIO VICENTE-VICENTE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of ADMERSON CLEBER-EUGENIO VICENTE-VICENTE v. STATE OF FLORIDA (ADMERSON CLEBER-EUGENIO VICENTE-VICENTE v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
ADMERSON CLEBER-EUGENIO VICENTE-VICENTE, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D19-60
[December 19, 2019]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Lawrence M. Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 432015CF001180A.
Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Richard G. Bartmon, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Fourth District, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Matthew Steven Ocksrider, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
DAMOORGIAN, GERBER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ADMERSON CLEBER-EUGENIO VICENTE-VICENTE v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/admerson-cleber-eugenio-vicente-vicente-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.