Admar of New Jersey, Inc. v. Rozany

523 So. 2d 1196, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 827, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1224, 1988 WL 25441
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 30, 1988·No. No. 87-0495·Published

Opinion

GUNTHER, Judge.

We reverse the trial court’s entry of summary judgment on the authority of GNLV Corp. v. Featherstone, 504 So.2d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 513 So.2d 1061 (Fla.1987). However, we affirm the trial court’s dismissal of the counterclaim. The counterclaim was compulsory in nature and should have been brought in the New Jersey action. See, Mori v. Hartz Mountain Development Corp., 193 N.J.Super. 47, 472 A.2d 150 (N.J.Super.Ct.App.Div.1983).

[1197] REVERSE AND REMAND in part; AFFIRM in part.

DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Admar of New Jersey, Inc. v. Rozany, 523 So. 2d 1196, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 827, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1224, 1988 WL 25441 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

523 So. 2d 1196 (Admar of New Jersey, Inc. v. Rozany) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

GNLV CORP. v. Featherstone
504 So. 2d 63 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Mori v. Hartz Mountain Development Corp.
472 A.2d 150 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1983)