Admar of New Jersey, Inc. v. Rozany
This text of 523 So. 2d 1196 (Admar of New Jersey, Inc. v. Rozany) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the trial court’s entry of summary judgment on the authority of GNLV Corp. v. Featherstone, 504 So.2d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 513 So.2d 1061 (Fla.1987). However, we affirm the trial court’s dismissal of the counterclaim. The counterclaim was compulsory in nature and should have been brought in the New Jersey action. See, Mori v. Hartz Mountain Development Corp., 193 N.J.Super. 47, 472 A.2d 150 (N.J.Super.Ct.App.Div.1983).
[1197]*1197REVERSE AND REMAND in part; AFFIRM in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
523 So. 2d 1196, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 827, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1224, 1988 WL 25441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/admar-of-new-jersey-inc-v-rozany-fladistctapp-1988.