Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/A.D.M. v. State

A.D.M. v. State

614 So. 2d 691, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3089, 1993 WL 66314
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 12, 1993
DocketNo. 92-869
StatusPublished

This text of 614 So. 2d 691 (A.D.M. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
A.D.M. v. State, 614 So. 2d 691, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3089, 1993 WL 66314 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State concedes that A.D.M.’s placement in secure detention as a punishment for contempt was improper pursuant to A.A. v. Rolle, 604 So.2d 813 (Fla.1992). Accordingly, we vacate the order of detention and remand for proceedings consistent with Rolle.

REVERSED and CAUSE REMANDED.

COBB and W. SHARP, JJ., and COWART, Judge, Retired, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

AA v. Rolle
604 So. 2d 813 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
614 So. 2d 691, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3089, 1993 WL 66314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adm-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.