Adlman v. Sobel
248 A.D. 569
Opinion
Order denying motion of defendant-appellant to vacate certain portions of a subpoena duces tecum unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., MeAvoy, O’Malley, Glennon and Cohn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adlman v. Sobel, 248 A.D. 569 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
248 A.D. 569 (Adlman v. Sobel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.