Adlman v. Sobel
248 A.D. 569
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1936
StatusPublished
This text of 248 A.D. 569 (Adlman v. Sobel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Adlman v. Sobel, 248 A.D. 569 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
Opinion
Order denying motion of defendant-appellant to vacate certain portions of a subpoena duces tecum unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., MeAvoy, O’Malley, Glennon and Cohn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
248 A.D. 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adlman-v-sobel-nyappdiv-1936.