Adler v. Telly & Di Napoli, Inc.
This text of 274 A.D. 1001 (Adler v. Telly & Di Napoli, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when an arm or boom of a hoist mounted upon a truck, being used by a subcontractor to hoist granite blocks from a freight train, broke by reason of a patent defect in the hoisting apparatus. Order denying motion to set aside a verdict against appellant, the general contractor in charge of the work in which the truck was used, and dismissing the cross complaint of appellant against defendants-respondents, the subcontractors using the truck in that work, and the judgment therein entered in favor of the plaintiff-respondent and against appellant, and dismissing the said cross complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff-respondent and to the defendants-respondents. (Adler v. Long Island R. R. Co., 297 N. Y. 542; Schwartz v. Merola Bros. Constr. Corp., 290 N. Y. 145, 156-157.) Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See post, p. 1065.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
274 A.D. 1001, 84 N.Y.S.2d 305, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adler-v-telly-di-napoli-inc-nyappdiv-1948.