Adler v. Telly & Di Napoli, Inc.

274 A.D. 1001, 84 N.Y.S.2d 305, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4448
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 13, 1948·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when an arm or boom of a hoist mounted upon a truck, being used by a subcontractor to hoist granite blocks from a freight train, broke by reason of a patent defect in the hoisting apparatus. Order denying motion to set aside a verdict against appellant, the general contractor in charge of the work in which the truck was used, and dismissing the cross complaint of appellant against defendants-respondents, the subcontractors using the truck in that work, and the judgment therein entered in favor of the plaintiff-respondent and against appellant, and dismissing the said cross complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff-respondent and to the defendants-respondents. (Adler v. Long Island R. R. Co., 297 N. Y. 542; Schwartz v. Merola Bros. Constr. Corp., 290 N. Y. 145, 156-157.) Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See post, p. 1065.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adler v. Telly & Di Napoli, Inc., 274 A.D. 1001, 84 N.Y.S.2d 305, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4448 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

274 A.D. 1001 (Adler v. Telly & Di Napoli, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maceda v. Ellis Chingos Construction Corp.
22 Misc. 2d 269 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)