Adler Consulting Corp. v. Executive Life Insurance Co.

483 So. 2d 501, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 469, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6425
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 18, 1986·No. No. 85-1193·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A competitor has no standing to enforce the licensing provisions of the statutes of this state. See 53 C.J.S., Licenses § 6 p. 466; Compare Mercer v. Hemmings, 194 So.2d 579, 583 (Fla.1966).

A contract terminable “at will” cannot be the subject of tortious interference where said interference is lawful competition. Unistar Corporation v. Child, 415 So.2d 733 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Wackenhut Corporation v. Maimone, 389 So.2d 656 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Lake Gateway Motor Inn, Inc. v. Matt’s Sunshine Gift Shops, Inc., 361 So.2d 769 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). Therefore we find no error in the summary judgment under review and affirm.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adler Consulting Corp. v. Executive Life Insurance Co., 483 So. 2d 501, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 469, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6425 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

483 So. 2d 501 (Adler Consulting Corp. v. Executive Life Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Sterile Products Corp.
572 So. 2d 519 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)