Adkison v. State

133 So. 3d 607, 2014 WL 860563, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2969
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 4, 2014·No. No. 1D12-1930·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Terry Adkison, Appellant, appeals from his convictions and sentences for three counts of sexual battery with a deadly weapon. He raises two issues, only one of which merits reversal. We affirm Appellant’s convictions but vacate his sentences and remand for resentencing because the court’s oral pronouncement “can be reasonably read only as conditioning the sentence, at least in part, on Appellant’s lack of remorse and claim of innocence, which is a violation of Appellant’s due process rights.” See Dumas v. State, 134 So.3d 1048 (Fla. Feb. 8, 2013); Jackson v. State, 39 So.3d 427, 428 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). This error requires resentencing before a different judge. Jackson, 39 So.3d at 428.

AFFIRMED in part; VACATED in part; and REMANDED with instructions to resentence Appellant before a different judge.

BENTON, PADOVANO, and RAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adkison v. State, 133 So. 3d 607, 2014 WL 860563, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2969 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

133 So. 3d 607 (Adkison v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alvin Davis v. State of Florida
268 So. 3d 958 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
Wood v. State
148 So. 3d 557 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Trimeka Shanta Wood v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014