Adkinson v. State

625 So. 2d 126, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10488, 1993 WL 408222
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 15, 1993·No. No. 92-3978·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Wilmer Ray Adkinson appeals a final judgment entered after remand for resentencing. Adkinson v. State, 590 So.2d 480 (Fla. 1st DCA1991). Adkinson contends that the circuit court erred in imposing departure sentences after remand in circuit cases 90-84 and 90-61 without contemporaneously pro[127] viding written reasons for departure, citing Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990). The state properly concedes error.

Accordingly, we vacate Adk&son’s sentences in circuit cases 90-84 and 90-61 and remand “for resentencing with no possibility of departure from the guidelines.” Owens v. State, 598 So.2d 64, 64 (Fla.1992).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED and REMANDED in part.

ZEHMER, C.J., and JOANOS and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adkinson v. State, 625 So. 2d 126, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10488, 1993 WL 408222 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

625 So. 2d 126 (Adkinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ree v. State
565 So. 2d 1329 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Owens v. State
598 So. 2d 64 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Adkinson v. State
590 So. 2d 480 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)