Adkinson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Adkinson v. State

625 So. 2d 126, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10488, 1993 WL 408222

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 15, 1993

DocketNo. 92-3978

StatusPublished

This text of 625 So. 2d 126 (Adkinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adkinson v. State, 625 So. 2d 126, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10488, 1993 WL 408222 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Wilmer Ray Adkinson appeals a final judgment entered after remand for resentencing. Adkinson v. State, 590 So.2d 480 (Fla. 1st DCA1991). Adkinson contends that the circuit court erred in imposing departure sentences after remand in circuit cases 90-84 and 90-61 without contemporaneously pro[127]*127viding written reasons for departure, citing Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990). The state properly concedes error.

Accordingly, we vacate Adk&son’s sentences in circuit cases 90-84 and 90-61 and remand “for resentencing with no possibility of departure from the guidelines.” Owens v. State, 598 So.2d 64, 64 (Fla.1992).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED and REMANDED in part.

ZEHMER, C.J., and JOANOS and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI