Adkinson & Chappell v. Garrett

1 White & W. 23
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 7, 1877
DocketNo. 2, Op. Book No. 1, p. 268
StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 23 (Adkinson & Chappell v. Garrett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adkinson & Chappell v. Garrett, 1 White & W. 23 (Tex. Ct. App. 1877).

Opinion

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§ 45. Where a jury is waived and cause decided by judge. When the court is substituted for the jury, its decision upon the facts has the same conclusive effect as the verdict of a jury. In such a case, unless the judgment of the court is without evidence, it will not be reversed on appeal. [Jordan v. McBrophy, 41 Tex. 283; Bailey v. White, 13 Tex. 114; Gilliard v. Chessney, 13 Tex. 337; McFarland v. Hall, 17 Tex. 690.]

§ 46. Conflicting evidence. In a case of conflicting evidence, in order to justify this court in setting aside a verdict on the ground that it is against.the weight of evidence, it is not sufficient that the verdict does not clearly appear to be right; it must clearly appear to be wrong, else it will not be disturbed. [Stroud v. Springfield, 28 Tex. 651; Powell v. Haley, 28 Tex. 53.]

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bailey's Adm'r v. White
13 Tex. 114 (Texas Supreme Court, 1854)
Gilliard v. Chessney
13 Tex. 337 (Texas Supreme Court, 1855)
Jordan v. Brophy
41 Tex. 283 (Texas Supreme Court, 1874)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 White & W. 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adkinson-chappell-v-garrett-texapp-1877.