Adkins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Adkins v. State

788 So. 2d 1136, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9695, 2001 WL 789069

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 13, 2001

DocketNo. 5D01-1516

StatusPublished

This text of 788 So. 2d 1136 (Adkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adkins v. State, 788 So. 2d 1136, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9695, 2001 WL 789069 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. In 1998, this court warned Mr. Adkins about filing frivolous, successive pleadings. Adkins v. State, 729 So.2d 955 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). Notwithstanding that warning, and in addition to his other post-conviction motions, he has now filed an untimely third Based upon his numerous and successive meritless pro se filings, we hold that Mr. Adkins is precluded from filing any additional pro se appeals, pleadings, motions or petitions per[1137]*1137taining to his conviction and sentence for Sexual Battery of a Child Under Twelve Years of Age in trial court Case No. 92-34004-CFAES, unless reviewed and signed by an attorney licensed to practice in the State of Florida. The clerk of this court is directed not to accept from Mr. Adkins, as petitioner or appellant, any further pro se pleadings or filings which relate to that case. See Jackson v. Florida Dep’t of Corrections, 790 So.2d 398 (Fla. 2001); Vickson v. Singletary, 734 So.2d 376 (Fla.1999); Isley v. State, 652 So.2d 409, 410-11 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Carnes v. State, 781 So.2d 489 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

HARRIS, PETERSON, and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. In 1998, this court warned Mr. Adkins about filing frivolous, successive pleadings. Adkins v. State, 729 So.2d 955 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). Notwithstanding that warning, and in addition to his other post-conviction motions, he has now filed an untimely third Based upon his numerous and successive meritless pro se filings, we hold that Mr. Adkins is precluded from filing any additional pro se appeals, pleadings, motions or petitions per[1137]*1137taining to his conviction and sentence for Sexual Battery of a Child Under Twelve Years of Age in trial court Case No. 92-34004-CFAES, unless reviewed and signed by an attorney licensed to practice in the State of Florida. The clerk of this court is directed not to accept from Mr. Adkins, as petitioner or appellant, any further pro se pleadings or filings which relate to that case. See Jackson v. Florida Dep’t of Corrections, 790 So.2d 398 (Fla. 2001); Vickson v. Singletary, 734 So.2d 376 (Fla.1999); Isley v. State, 652 So.2d 409, 410-11 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Carnes v. State, 781 So.2d 489 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

HARRIS, PETERSON, and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

788 So. 2d 1136, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9695, 2001 WL 789069, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adkins-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack