Adkins v. State

295 So. 2d 120, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7057
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 7, 1974
DocketNo. 73-916
StatusPublished

This text of 295 So. 2d 120 (Adkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adkins v. State, 295 So. 2d 120, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7057 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully reviewed the points raised on appeal by appellant, Ray Autry Adkins, and after due consideration find them to be without merit. In arriving at this conclusion, we adhere to this court’s previous opinion rendered in Chester v. State, Fla.App.2nd, 1973, 276 So.2d 76. [121]*121This decision is rendered without prejudice to the appellant to raise the question of the ineffectiveness of his counsel in the trial court under Rule 3.850, CrPR, 33 F.S.A. Accordingly, we

Affirm.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chester v. State
276 So. 2d 76 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
295 So. 2d 120, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adkins-v-state-fladistctapp-1974.