Adkins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Adkins v. State

295 So. 2d 120, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7057

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Adkins v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15093 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 7, 1974·No. No. 73-916·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully reviewed the points raised on appeal by appellant, Ray Autry Adkins, and after due consideration find them to be without merit. In arriving at this conclusion, we adhere to this court’s previous opinion rendered in Chester v. State, Fla.App.2nd, 1973, 276 So.2d 76. [121]*121This decision is rendered without prejudice to the appellant to raise the question of the ineffectiveness of his counsel in the trial court under Rule 3.850, CrPR, 33 F.S.A. Accordingly, we

Affirm.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully reviewed the points raised on appeal by appellant, Ray Autry Adkins, and after due consideration find them to be without merit. In arriving at this conclusion, we adhere to this court’s previous opinion rendered in Chester v. State, Fla.App.2nd, 1973, 276 So.2d 76. [121]*121This decision is rendered without prejudice to the appellant to raise the question of the ineffectiveness of his counsel in the trial court under Rule 3.850, CrPR, 33 F.S.A. Accordingly, we

Affirm.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.

Adkins v. State, 295 So. 2d 120, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7057 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

295 So. 2d 120 (Adkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related