Adkins v. State
This text of 295 So. 2d 120 (Adkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have carefully reviewed the points raised on appeal by appellant, Ray Autry Adkins, and after due consideration find them to be without merit. In arriving at this conclusion, we adhere to this court’s previous opinion rendered in Chester v. State, Fla.App.2nd, 1973, 276 So.2d 76. [121]*121This decision is rendered without prejudice to the appellant to raise the question of the ineffectiveness of his counsel in the trial court under Rule 3.850, CrPR, 33 F.S.A. Accordingly, we
Affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
295 So. 2d 120, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adkins-v-state-fladistctapp-1974.