Adkins v. McDonald

667 F. App'x 395
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 22, 2016
DocketNo. 16-6362
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 667 F. App'x 395 (Adkins v. McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adkins v. McDonald, 667 F. App'x 395 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darryl Boyd Adkins appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ summary judgment motion in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Adkins v. McDonald, No. 5:14-ct-03169-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DONALDSON v. BAKER
M.D. North Carolina, 2021
ALLEN v. CITY OF GRAHAM, NC
M.D. North Carolina, 2021

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
667 F. App'x 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adkins-v-mcdonald-ca4-2016.