Adkins v. McDonald

Fourth Circuit

Adkins v. McDonald

667 F. App'x 395

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 22, 2016·No. No. 16-6362·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darryl Boyd Adkins appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ summary judgment motion in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Adkins v. McDonald, No. 5:14-ct-03169-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darryl Boyd Adkins appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ summary judgment motion in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Adkins v. McDonald, No. 5:14-ct-03169-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Adkins v. McDonald, 667 F. App'x 395 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

667 F. App'x 395 (Adkins v. McDonald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related