Adkins v. Lucky Stores, Inc.
This text of 13 F. App'x 503 (Adkins v. Lucky Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Plaintiffs-appellants, former employees of Lucky/American Stores’ Fullerton warehouse, appeal from (1) the denial of their motion to file a second amended complaint; (2) summary judgment in favor of the defendants; and (3) the award of attorney’s fees to the defendants. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its orders of October 27, 1999, November 9, 1999, and January 24, 2000, respectively.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts in this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 F. App'x 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adkins-v-lucky-stores-inc-ca9-2001.