Adkins v. Holland

87 F. App'x 886
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 17, 2004·No. 03-1377·Unpublished·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William T. Adkins appeals the district court’s order dismissing, under Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), all but one of his claims for disability pension benefits under the provisions of the United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan, and the order granting summary judgment to the Trustees of the Plan on his remaining claim. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Adkins v. Holland, No. CA-02-249-2 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 20, 2002 & Mar. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adkins v. Holland, 87 F. App'x 886 (4th Cir. 2004).

87 F. App'x 886 (Adkins v. Holland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adkins v. Holland
543 U.S. 867 (Supreme Court, 2004)