Adkins v. Holland
This text of 87 F. App'x 886 (Adkins v. Holland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
William T. Adkins appeals the district court’s order dismissing, under Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), all but one of his claims for disability pension benefits under the provisions of the United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan, and the order granting summary judgment to the Trustees of the Plan on his remaining claim. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Adkins v. Holland, No. CA-02-249-2 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 20, 2002 & Mar. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
87 F. App'x 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adkins-v-holland-ca4-2004.