Adkins v. Flemming
This text of 29 Iowa 122 (Adkins v. Flemming) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On the trial it was agreed that the one hundred dollars claimed by defendant, is for this amount placed by plaintiff in the hands of the defendant, as a stakeholder, upon a wager on a horse race run between plaintiff and one Luallen. Defendant was one of the judges of the race. Plaintiff, after the race, and a decision that he was beaten, but before the money was paid to Luallen, notified the defendant not to pay the money to Luallen ; but, notwithstanding notice and after the notice was given him, the defendant paid the money to Luallen.
On this statement the circuit court rendered judgment [123]*123for plaintiff, which was affirmed by the general term, and is also affirmed by this court. No opinion is needed beyond a reference to Shannon v. Baumer, 10 Iowa, 210, in which we understand the rule to be that the money deposited as a wager can be recovered at any time, so long as it remains in the hands of the stakeholder.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 Iowa 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adkins-v-flemming-iowa-1870.