Adkins v. Doolen
23 Kan. 659
This text of 23 Kan. 659 (Adkins v. Doolen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Adkins v. Doolen, 23 Kan. 659 (kan 1880).
Opinion
The motion to quash the alternative writ, issued in this case, is sustained, upon the authority of Reedy v. Eagle, ante, p. 254; Bobbett v. The State, 10 Kas. 9; and Turner v. Comm’rs, 10 Kas. 16.
’ Judgment for costs will therefore be duly entered against the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dunn v. Board of County Commissioners
177 P.2d 207 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1947)
Kern v. City Commissioners of Newton
77 P.2d 954 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1938)
Fidelity National Bank & Trust Co. v. Morris
273 P. 425 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1929)
Windsor v. Polk County
87 N.W. 704 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1901)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
23 Kan. 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adkins-v-doolen-kan-1880.