Adkins v. Doolen
23 Kan. 659
Opinion
The motion to quash the alternative writ, issued in this case, is sustained, upon the authority of Reedy v. Eagle, ante, p. 254; Bobbett v. The State, 10 Kas. 9; and Turner v. Comm’rs, 10 Kas. 16.
’ Judgment for costs will therefore be duly entered against the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adkins v. Doolen, 23 Kan. 659 (kan 1880).
23 Kan. 659 (Adkins v. Doolen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dunn v. Board of County Commissioners
177 P.2d 207 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1947)
Kern v. City Commissioners of Newton
77 P.2d 954 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1938)
Fidelity National Bank & Trust Co. v. Morris
273 P. 425 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1929)
Windsor v. Polk County
87 N.W. 704 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1901)