Adkins v. Division of Corrections

20 Ct. Cl. 29
CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims
DecidedDecember 17, 1993
DocketCC-92-248
StatusPublished

This text of 20 Ct. Cl. 29 (Adkins v. Division of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adkins v. Division of Corrections, 20 Ct. Cl. 29 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and the respondent’s Amended Answer.

Claimant seeks recovery for the replacement of a ring that was lost while claimant was an inmate at the West Virginia State Penitentiary at Moundsville, West Virginia, a facility of the respondent.

The respondent admits the validity and amount of the claim and further states that the ring belonging to the claimant was misplaced by a correctional officer. Respondent does not have a fiscal method for compensating the claimant.

The Court, having reviewed the Petition and Amended Answer in this claim, has determined that claimant suffered a loss as a result of the negligence of the part of the respondent. The Court is of the opinion that $150.00 is the fair and reasonable value of the personal property of the claimant.

In view of the foregoing, the Court makes an award to the claimant in the amount of $150.00.

Award of $150.00.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Ct. Cl. 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adkins-v-division-of-corrections-wvctcl-1993.