Adkins v. Daniels
This text of Adkins v. Daniels (Adkins v. Daniels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. West Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
CHARLESTON DIVISION
NATHANIEL LEE ADKINS,
Plaintiff,
v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-cv-00038
CAMRYN T. DANIELS, et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Pending before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Boone County Commission, Boone County Sheriff’s Department, and Camryn T. Daniels (“Moving Defendants”). [ECF No. 14]. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is DENIED as moot. On May 12, 2023, Moving Defendants moved to dismiss Plaintiff’s original Complaint. [ECF No. 1]. On June 23, 2023, Plaintiff timely filed his Amended Complaint, [ECF No. 21], pursuant to the Scheduling Order entered on May 31, 2023, [ECF No. 20]. “As a general rule, ‘an amended pleading supersedes the original pleading, rendering the original pleading of no effect.” , 671 F. App’x 162, 163 (4th Cir. 2016) (unpublished) (quoting , 238 F.3d 567, 572 (4th Cir. 2001)). When a plaintiff amends a complaint while a motion to dismiss is pending, a court may deny the motion as moot. See Turner v. Kight, 192 F. Supp. 2d 391, 397 (D. Md. 2002) (denying the motion to dismiss the original complaint as moot because the original complaint was superseded by the amended complaint); see also Sennott v. Adams, No. 6:18-cv-02813-GRA, 2014 WL 2434745, at *3 (D.S.C. May 29, 2014) ““[A] defendant’s previous motion to dismiss is rendered moot when a plaintiff files an amended complaint.”); Skibbe v. Accredited Home Lenders, Inc., No. 2:08-cv- 01393, 2014 WL 2117088, at *3 (S.D. W. Va. May 21, 2014) (denying as moot defendants’ renewed motion to dismiss where “[t]he Third Amended Complaint superseded the Amended Complaint and the Second Amended Complaint”). Here, Plaintiffs Amended Complaint superseded his original Complaint. Accordingly, Moving Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, [ECF No. 14], is DENIED as moot. The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party. ENTER: January 24, 2024
Np G ew STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Adkins v. Daniels, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adkins-v-daniels-wvsd-2024.