Adkins v. Daniels

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia
DecidedJanuary 24, 2024
Docket2:23-cv-00038
StatusUnknown

This text of Adkins v. Daniels (Adkins v. Daniels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. West Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adkins v. Daniels, (S.D.W. Va. 2024).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

CHARLESTON DIVISION

NATHANIEL LEE ADKINS,

Plaintiff,

v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-cv-00038

CAMRYN T. DANIELS, et al.,

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Pending before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Boone County Commission, Boone County Sheriff’s Department, and Camryn T. Daniels (“Moving Defendants”). [ECF No. 14]. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is DENIED as moot. On May 12, 2023, Moving Defendants moved to dismiss Plaintiff’s original Complaint. [ECF No. 1]. On June 23, 2023, Plaintiff timely filed his Amended Complaint, [ECF No. 21], pursuant to the Scheduling Order entered on May 31, 2023, [ECF No. 20]. “As a general rule, ‘an amended pleading supersedes the original pleading, rendering the original pleading of no effect.” , 671 F. App’x 162, 163 (4th Cir. 2016) (unpublished) (quoting , 238 F.3d 567, 572 (4th Cir. 2001)). When a plaintiff amends a complaint while a motion to dismiss is pending, a court may deny the motion as moot. See Turner v. Kight, 192 F. Supp. 2d 391, 397 (D. Md. 2002) (denying the motion to dismiss the original complaint as moot because the original complaint was superseded by the amended complaint); see also Sennott v. Adams, No. 6:18-cv-02813-GRA, 2014 WL 2434745, at *3 (D.S.C. May 29, 2014) ““[A] defendant’s previous motion to dismiss is rendered moot when a plaintiff files an amended complaint.”); Skibbe v. Accredited Home Lenders, Inc., No. 2:08-cv- 01393, 2014 WL 2117088, at *3 (S.D. W. Va. May 21, 2014) (denying as moot defendants’ renewed motion to dismiss where “[t]he Third Amended Complaint superseded the Amended Complaint and the Second Amended Complaint”). Here, Plaintiffs Amended Complaint superseded his original Complaint. Accordingly, Moving Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, [ECF No. 14], is DENIED as moot. The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party. ENTER: January 24, 2024

Np G ew STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Turner v. Kight
192 F. Supp. 2d 391 (D. Maryland, 2002)
Darrel White v. Dwayne Turner
671 F. App'x 162 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Adkins v. Daniels, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adkins-v-daniels-wvsd-2024.