Adkins v. Crosby

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Adkins v. Crosby

886 So. 2d 264, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 16076, 2004 WL 2402653

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 28, 2004·No. No. 1D03-3870·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the circuit court issued a final order before the time expired for petitioner to file a reply, we grant the petition for writ of certiorari, reverse the final order and remand for further proceedings in which the petitioner is provided an opportunity to reply to the response filed below. See Bard v. Wolson, 687 So.2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

PETITION GRANTED.

BOOTH, BARFIELD and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because the circuit court issued a final order before the time expired for petitioner to file a reply, we grant the petition for writ of certiorari, reverse the final order and remand for further proceedings in which the petitioner is provided an opportunity to reply to the response filed below. See Bard v. Wolson, 687 So.2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

PETITION GRANTED.

BOOTH, BARFIELD and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Adkins v. Crosby, 886 So. 2d 264, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 16076, 2004 WL 2402653 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

886 So. 2d 264 (Adkins v. Crosby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related