Adkins v. Correctional Officer McDonald

Fourth Circuit

Adkins v. Correctional Officer McDonald

600 F. App'x 159

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 28, 2015·No. No. 14-7879·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darryl Boyd Adkins appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint against Defendants after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2012) review. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Adkins’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Adkins v. McDonald, No. 5:14-ct-03144-F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [160] materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darryl Boyd Adkins appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint against Defendants after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2012) review. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Adkins’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Adkins v. McDonald, No. 5:14-ct-03144-F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [160] materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Adkins v. Correctional Officer McDonald, 600 F. App'x 159 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

600 F. App'x 159 (Adkins v. Correctional Officer McDonald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related