Adkins v. Bauknecht

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 24, 2009
Docket08-7585
StatusUnpublished

This text of Adkins v. Bauknecht (Adkins v. Bauknecht) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adkins v. Bauknecht, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7585

PAUL ADKINS, JR.,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

DONALD F. BAUKNECHT, Warden FCI Williamsburg,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (4:07-cv-02789-HFF)

Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 24, 2009

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Adkins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Paul Adkins, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Adkins v. Bauknecht, No.

4:07-cv-02789-HEF (D.S.C. June 24, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Adkins v. Bauknecht, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adkins-v-bauknecht-ca4-2009.