Adkins Transfer Co. v. Dornbos

Supreme Court

Adkins Transfer Co. v. Dornbos

393 U.S. 322, 89 S. Ct. 555, 21 L. Ed. 2d 516, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 2870

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 13, 1969

DocketNo. 738

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 393 U.S. 322 (Adkins Transfer Co. v. Dornbos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adkins Transfer Co. v. Dornbos, 393 U.S. 322, 89 S. Ct. 555, 21 L. Ed. 2d 516, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 2870 (1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a final judgment.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Mr. Justice Stewart is of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits. Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a final judgment.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Mr. Justice Stewart is of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to the hearing of the case on the merits. Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

393 U.S. 322, 89 S. Ct. 555, 21 L. Ed. 2d 516, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 2870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adkins-transfer-co-v-dornbos-scotus-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack