Adjustment Department, Olympia Credit Bureau, Inc. v. Smedegard
236 P.2d 560, 39 Wash. 2d 962, 1951 Wash. LEXIS 370
Opinion
Upon a rehearing En Banc of respondents’ motion to dismiss the appeal for failure to serve the appeal bond, as required by Rule 22, Rules on Appeal, 34A Wn. (2d) 25,
It Is Ordered that the motion be and the same is hereby denied. See Rule 22, as amended.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adjustment Department, Olympia Credit Bureau, Inc. v. Smedegard, 236 P.2d 560, 39 Wash. 2d 962, 1951 Wash. LEXIS 370 (Wash. 1951).
236 P.2d 560 (Adjustment Department, Olympia Credit Bureau, Inc. v. Smedegard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kraft v. Spencer Tucker Sales, Inc.
239 P.2d 563 (Washington Supreme Court, 1952)
Cline v. Price
239 P.2d 322 (Washington Supreme Court, 1951)