Adjmi v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Adjmi v. State

182 So. 2d 242

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJanuary 26, 1966

DocketNo. 34172

StatusPublished

This text of 182 So. 2d 242 (Adjmi v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adjmi v. State, 182 So. 2d 242 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the Writ and have heard argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the jurisdictional conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A., does not appear. Therefore, the Writ must be and is hereby discharged and the Petition for Writ of Certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., THOMAS, O’CON-NELL and CALDWELL, JJ., and MASON, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the Writ and have heard argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the jurisdictional conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A., does not appear. Therefore, the Writ must be and is hereby discharged and the Petition for Writ of Certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., THOMAS, O’CON-NELL and CALDWELL, JJ., and MASON, Circuit Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 So. 2d 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adjmi-v-state-fla-1966.