Adibeh J. Albert v. Kal-Dean Industries Inc., A. Dean Ismail, and Pal-Tex Investments, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 8, 2012·No. 04-11-00844-CV·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-11-00844-CV

Adibeh J. ALBERT, Appellant

v.

KAL-DEAN INDUSTRIES INC., A. Dean Ismail, and Pal-Tex Investments, Inc., Appellees

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2006-CVF-1673-D3 Honorable Elma T. Salinas Ender, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 8, 2012

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

The trial court clerk filed a notification of late record, stating that the clerk’s record had

not been filed because appellant had failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for

preparing the record and that appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. By order

dated January 4, 2012, appellant was ordered to provide written proof to this court within ten

days of the date of the order that either (1) the clerk’s fee had been paid or arrangements had

been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s 04-11-00844-CV

fee. The order stated that if appellant failed to respond within the time provided, the appeal

would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). Because appellant

failed to respond to the order, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See id.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adibeh J. Albert v. Kal-Dean Industries Inc., A. Dean Ismail, and Pal-Tex Investments, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Adibeh J. Albert v. Kal-Dean Industries Inc., A. Dean Ismail, and Pal-Tex Investments, Inc. (Adibeh J. Albert v. Kal-Dean Industries Inc., A. Dean Ismail, and Pal-Tex Investments, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.