Adgers v. Counselor Lowe, No. Cv-02-0813826-S (Aug. 1, 2002)

2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 9940
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided August 1, 2002·No. No. CV-02-0813826-S·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

RULING
I have reconsidered the issues presented by the motion to dismiss and the plaintiff's responses to the motion and I reach the same result. Sovereign immunity and the doctrine of exhaustion bar the action as plead. Martin v. Brady, 64 Conn. App. 433 (2001); Fetterman v. Universityof Connecticut, 192 Conn. 539 (1984); State v. Sullivan, 189 Conn. 550 (1983). Further, no bond has been supplied.

Beach, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adgers v. Counselor Lowe, No. Cv-02-0813826-S (Aug. 1, 2002), 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 9940 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002).

2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 9940 (Adgers v. Counselor Lowe, No. Cv-02-0813826-S (Aug. 1, 2002)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sullivan v. State
457 A.2d 304 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1983)
Fetterman v. University of Connecticut
473 A.2d 1176 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1984)
Martin v. Brady
780 A.2d 961 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2001)