Home/Connecticut Superior Court/Adgers v. Counselor Lowe, No. Cv-02-0813826-S (Aug. 1, 2002)

Adgers v. Counselor Lowe, No. Cv-02-0813826-S (Aug. 1, 2002)

2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 9940
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedAugust 1, 2002
DocketNo. CV-02-0813826-S
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 9940 (Adgers v. Counselor Lowe, No. Cv-02-0813826-S (Aug. 1, 2002)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adgers v. Counselor Lowe, No. Cv-02-0813826-S (Aug. 1, 2002), 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 9940 (Colo. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

RULING
I have reconsidered the issues presented by the motion to dismiss and the plaintiff's responses to the motion and I reach the same result. Sovereign immunity and the doctrine of exhaustion bar the action as plead. Martin v. Brady, 64 Conn. App. 433 (2001); Fetterman v. Universityof Connecticut, 192 Conn. 539 (1984); State v. Sullivan, 189 Conn. 550 (1983). Further, no bond has been supplied.

Beach, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sullivan v. State
457 A.2d 304 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1983)
Fetterman v. University of Connecticut
473 A.2d 1176 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1984)
Martin v. Brady
780 A.2d 961 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 9940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adgers-v-counselor-lowe-no-cv-02-0813826-s-aug-1-2002-connsuperct-2002.